
This award encourages and recognizes student work in digital preservation. The prize in this category consists of a trophy to be retained by the recipient’s institution, certificates for participating individuals, and a travel grant contributing to the costs of attendance at an international conference in 2027.
Meet the finalists:
A Digitisation Strategy For Cornish Historical Sources
![]() |
Nominee: Alice Thacker, studying at King's College London This dissertation submitted for the MA in Digital Humanities examines how a digitisation strategy for Cornish historical sources could support future discourse around Cornish distinctiveness, particularly through cultural preservation, public access, research, education, and the Cornish language revival. Focusing on materials held by Kresen Kernow and related Cornish cultural institutions, the study argues that these sources are not only archival records but active resources for strengthening understanding of Cornwall’s recognised minority status, language heritage, and cultural identity. Many important manuscripts, maps, records, photographs, and multilingual texts remain accessible only through physical archive visits, limiting their value for local communities, researchers, educators, and wider global audiences. Read more |
Preserving ‘Research Objects’ - Challenges and Requirements
![]() |
Nominee: Manuela Strickland, studying at Aberystwyth University
Read more |
The ethical implications of introducing FRT into archival metadata description and catalogue search for photographic and audiovisual collections
![]() |
Nominee: Rosa Methol, studying at University of Liverpool This dissertation examines the ethical implications of using facial recognition technology (FRT) in archival metadata creation and catalogue search for photographic and audiovisual collections. Combining a review of existing literature with focus groups involving five archivists, it explores how ethical concerns around biometric recognition technologies are understood in both theory and practice. The findings highlight areas of agreement, such as the need for cautious technology adoption, and areas of tension, including conflicts between improving access to collections and protecting privacy, consent, and limited institutional resources. The study bridges theoretical and practical perspectives and offers a framework for future debate on FRT in archives. Read more |




















































































































































