• Scope: The judges will assume a broad definition of digital preservation: projects which describe themselves with specialist terms like ‘conservation’, ‘continuity’, ‘curation’, ‘legacy’, ‘permanent accessibility’, ‘sustainment’ or ‘sustainability’ will be eligible so long as they can demonstrate that they are working towards securing our digital legacy. Typically, digitization projects will not be eligible unless they offer a specific deliverable that will improve long term access to the digital estate. The judges’ decision will be final, and no discussion will be entered into.
  • Deadline: There will be no extensions to the deadline.
  • Who can apply? The awards are open to all. They seek to include entries from all organization types, across all sectors – public, private, for-profit and non-profit and there is no restriction to whether the nominee is a member of the DPC. The awards are international in scope and the project may have been carried out anywhere in the world; judges will be looking to see how results and lessons learned are being shared with the wider digital preservation community so that they may also learn from the efforts undertaken. Nominations must be supported by senior management within your institution and nominations based on an external grant or commission should be supported by the grant giving agency or commissioning agent. Joint nominations are welcome from individuals or teams working in the public or private sectors, though a single point of contact must be agreed. There is no fee to enter the Digital Preservation Awards.
  • Do I need support from my manager? Yes. The purpose of the Digital Preservation Awards is about raising awareness about digital preservation. By seeking the approval of management, we are asking you to undertake a modest amount of internal advocacy. For the purposes of the student award, the course convener or head of department is effectively the senior manager.
  • Why is there a timeframe? The Awards are given for initiatives that were completed between 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2018, though judges will be asked to use their discretion in the admittance of nominations which have been completed outside that period. NB: although the completion date should fall between the dates given, work may have begun at any date.
  • What can we submit? Any project or initiative which has contributed to securing our digital legacy. By ‘project’ we mean any sustained and unified effort that works towards a discrete and definitive outcome. This might include the development and delivery of innovative services or a single program of work. Pilot projects and full-scale projects can be submitted though nominees may wish to signal the relationship between them. Combinations of projects which happen to operate in the same sphere, but which have no structural linkage should be avoided and large or complex projects are encouraged to concentrate on specific deliverables which can be more readily understood. Small projects with modest outcomes are particularly encouraged to apply because impact will be assessed in proportion to the total resource expended. 
  • Will you supply travel grants? Where necessary we will provide a contribution towards travel for two participants from each shortlisted nominee to attend the final judging panel, and for towards accommodation for one representative of each finalist to attend the ceremony.
  • Will you give feedback about our nomination? Yes. All nominees get feedback from the judges and shortlisted candidates will also receive feedback from their peers gathered from the public vote. The feedback will always be constructive, and the judges encourage nominees to append these comments to their professional and organizational CVs.
  • Can we promote the fact that we have submitted a nomination, been shortlisted or have won an award? Yes, we actively encourage you to do so. Where possible we will help you by providing supportive quotes or photography and will make time for press calls. The awards are run to engage the widest possible community in digital preservation, so we call on everyone interested in the awards to help raise their profile.
  • Can I ask your advice about completing my nomination form? Yes, but we reserve the right to publish that advice on the FAQ section of the Digital Preservation Awards Website to ensure that any points of clarification are available to all. We will keep such advice anonymous. There is a comment function on the FAQ section of the website that you can use to ask questions.
  • Can I nominate someone for the DPC Fellowship Award? DPC members will be formally invited to submit their nominations for the Fellowship Award with the second call for applications in June 2018. In response to this invitation, members should email their nominations to sarah [dot] middleton [at] dpconline [dot] org and we will collate a list for the judges’ consideration in September. At this stage, the judges will also submit their own nominations if not already made and a winner will be decided by the judges only, from this list. The winner of the Fellowship Award will be decided upon by the Judging Panel from this list of names.

Did this page answer your question?

If not, email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or add your question to the comments below...

Comments   

#1 Rosemary 2018-06-21 08:07
In the section of the nomination pack relating to the 'Long Description', it says that the description "should be more expansive and assume more knowledge, bearing in mind the diversity of the coalition and its partners." However, later on you say that "...we recommend that the long description is written for a lay audience."

Should I aim to write it for a lay audience or assume more knowledge of the digital preservation landscape in this particular section?
Quote
#2 Sarah L Middleton 2018-06-21 08:10
Please use the short description for your lay audience, as this will most likely be included on the website and in other communications if you are selected as a finalist, and use your Long Description for the advanced detail, as this is what the expert judges will use to assess your nomination.
Quote
#3 anon 2018-06-27 10:57
I’ve been reading the various categories and I’m not quite sure where we would fit maybe the safeguarding the digital legacy section? Please could you advise?
Quote
#4 Sarah Middleton 2018-06-27 10:58
The judges reserve the right to move awards into the category they think fits best and they use that discretion pretty vigorously each time. At least one winner ended up with an award they hadn’t applied for, and in several cases we have shortlisted projects with the entire intention of interviewing the nominee about their work and making sense of which category to fit.

Therefore the best advice would be to complete the application with one category in mind (probably the legacy one, but not necessarily), and let the judges move it to the category where it will have the best prospects.
Quote
#5 anon 2018-06-27 14:02
We are thinking about nominating ourselves for this award, but we are not sure if we are eligible based on the timeline of completed work. The current funded development cycle runs to October 2018. While we have achieved several milestone releases over the last few years, the overall project is not yet complete.

We see in the guidelines: "The Awards are given for initiatives that were completed between 1st August 2016 and 31st July 2018, though judges will be asked to use their discretion in the admittance of nominations which have been completed outside that period. NB: although the completion date should fall between the dates given, work may have begun at any date."

Would you mind letting us know what you think?
Quote
#6 William Kilbride 2018-06-27 14:08
My guidance would be to concentrate less on the precise timeline of the project so much as the release of viable outputs. So if you feel you have a good 'thing' but still need to write up the final report, then submit the 'thing'.

It also depends to some extent on the award you are nominating for. There may be additional angles to consider. I understand that your project is primarily focused on a particular content type. If you have some working examples then this could well be a strong contender for the 'Legacy' award; or if you have some clever tech then it's the Research and Innovation award. Or if you've applied your know-how with an industry partner, or have done training then there are awards for those too.

So my overall advice is to consider the project outputs over the project timeline, to consider multiple nominations and angles depending on what you want to emphasize. Note also that an application in 2018 doesn't stop you re-submitting in 2020.
Quote
#7 JS 2018-07-06 07:51
Please could you advise to whom the supporting letter from management for the DPC award should be addressed?
Quote
#8 Sarah Middleton 2018-07-06 07:52
You could address the letter of support to our Judging Panel.
Quote
#9 YK 2018-07-06 07:53
Is there anything in the regulations that prevents putting forward more than one nominee from one organisation, say for the student award?
Quote
#10 Sarah Middleton 2018-07-06 10:25
In broad terms there is no restriction on submitting more than one nomination from an institution; or for one nomination to be listed in multiple categories. However the student category is distinct. We only permit one nomination per institution. The guidance is as follows:

'Nominations in this category must be submitted by Heads of Departments or program conveners for the relevant course of study. Only one nomination will be permitted from each institute of higher education or research. Although the prize will be awarded to the student, the institute must lead the nomination. The nomination form (see DPA18B) must be accompanied by the piece of original work being submitted (or a link where that is more appropriate).'

You may therefore submit one nomination for the student award, directing other nominations to the other categories.
Quote

Scroll to top