Institutional Strategies - Collaboration

Print

There are compelling reasons and, in some cases, political pressure, to engage in greater collaboration within and between organisations in order effectively to confront and overcome the challenges of digital preservation.The range of skills required to do this demands flexibility within organisational structures to facilitate working in multi-disciplinary teams.There is a significant overlap in the digital preservation issues being faced by all organisations and across all sectors so it makes sense to capitalise on the potential benefits of pooling expertise and experience.

Internal collaboration

The usual assumption is that collaboration is external. However, most libraries and archives are managing a combination of paper-based and digital resources for the foreseeable future and will need to structure their organisation to manage the disparate needs of the two.The blurring of boundaries which digital technology produces means that sections and departments which are structurally distinct, will now need to co-operate in order to integrate the preservation and management of digital materials with other materials.

Such co-operation may well prove impossible unless there are mechanisms put in place to facilitate it. At the strategic level, a cross disciplinary committee charged with developing and overseeing objectives is one means of ensuring that the involvement of all relevant sections can be brought together (DLM Forum 1997). At the operational level, consideration will need to be given to defining what specific tasks are required and where those responsibilities logically lie. Setting up of working groups to investigate specific issues is one means of blending the range of skills required (Lee 1999).

Advantages

Disadvantages

External collaboration

External collaboration can include formal agreements between two or more organisations and informal arrangements between colleagues working in different institutions and possibly also across different sectors. See also Outreach.

Formal agreements can range from collaborative agreements for simply sharing information to accomplishing a specific task (for example working groups), or agreeing on specific allocation of archiving responsibilities. Clearly, the more complex the nature of the agreement, and the more differences there are between participating organisations in terms of their business needs, the more difficult it is likely to be to achieve, though the longer term benefits may also be greater.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Informal arrangements have always played an important role in maintaining current awareness among colleagues in similar disciplines. Digital technology provides an increased imperative to share experience and information in an emerging discipline as well as a simpler and more rapid means to contact colleagues known to be working in areas of interest.

Advantages

Disadvantages

 

See Exemplars and Further Reading